Outcomes After Endovascular Treatment of Direct Carotid Cavernous Fistulas: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Direct carotid cavernous fistulas (dCCF) involve pathologic shunting from the internal carotid artery into the cavernous sinus. We systematically reviewed the methods and outcomes of endovascular therapy for dCCF. METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE were used to identify studies that reported outcomes for patients undergoing embolization of dCCF. Outcomes included rates of occlusion, complications, symptom improvement, and recurrence. Pooled rates for each outcome were obtained with random effects models. The influence of embolization method on outcomes was assessed with meta-regressions. RESULTS: There were 16 studies comprising 270 patients. The mean age was 39.6 years, there were 36.3% females, and the mean follow-up was 19.7 months. Coils were the most common method of embolization (69.3%), followed by Onyx (31.1%), covered stent (22.2%), N-butyl cyanoacrylate (6.7%), and flow diversion (4.8%). The pooled overall occlusion rate was 92.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 86.3-95.6; I2 = 29.2%). The pooled complication rate was 10.9% (95% CI, 7.3-16; I2 = 0%). Use of coils were associated with a slightly lower odds of overall complications (odds ratio, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.97-0.99) and cranial nerve palsy (odds ratio, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.97-0.99). The pooled fistula recurrence rate was 8.3% (95% CI, 4.3-15.4; I2 = 30.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular therapy for dCCF is associated with high occlusion and low complication rates. Recurrence is not uncommon, highlighting the need for close follow-up.

Endovascular embolization for the treatment of epistaxis: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular embolization (EE) is a treatment option for epistaxis refractory to first-line interventions. Data regarding embolization is limited to small case series and a meta-analysis has not been performed. METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE were used to identify studies that reported outcomes for at least 10 patients undergoing EE for epistaxis. Outcomes included procedural success, rebleeding, and complications. Pooled rates for each outcome were obtained with random effects models. RESULTS: A total of 44 studies comprising 1664 patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean age ranged from 28.1 to 67 years and there were 28.4% females. The pooled procedural success rate was 87% (95% CI 83.9-89.6, I2 = 53%). Age (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.91-1) and hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia ([HHT], OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.96-0.99) were associated with decreased odds of success. The pooled rebleeding rate was 16.4% (95% CI 13.6-19.6, I2 = 48%), and HHT was associated with greater odds of rebleeding (OR 1.02, 95% CI 1-1.03). The pooled overall complication rate was 14.4% (95% CI 9.8-20.6, I2 = 85.8%). The pooled rates of stroke and vision loss were 2.1% (95% CI 1.5-3.1, I2 = 1.5%) and 1.8% (95% CI 1.2-2.6, I2 = 0%), respectively. CONCLUSION: EE for epistaxis has a high rate of procedural success. Interventionalists should be aware of the risk for rebleeding, especially among patients with HHT.

Transition from Proximal to Distal Radial Access for Diagnostic Cerebral Angiography: Learning Curve Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Distal transradial access (dTRA) has several advantages compared with proximal transradial access (pTRA) for cerebral angiography. The learning curve for transitioning from pTRA to dTRA has not been described. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of the first 75 diagnostic cerebral angiograms performed with dTRA by a single operator was performed. Outcomes included time for sheath insertion, sheath to first vessel time, procedure duration, fluoroscopy time, radiation dose, and contrast volume. Their associations with procedure number were evaluated with multivariate linear regressions, segmented linear regression, and locally weighted regression (LOESS). RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 56.1 years and 61.3% were female. Seventy-four of 75 angiograms were successfully completed with dTRA. There were 3 minor and no major complications. After adjusting for covariates, sheath to first vessel time (ß = -0.50, P < 0.001) and procedure duration (ß = -0.26, P = 0.002) were associated with procedure number. Time for sheath insertion, fluoroscopy time, radiation dose, and contrast volume were not associated with procedure number. Segmented linear regression identified break-points of 33 for sheath to first vessel time and 11 for procedure duration, which corresponded to the procedure number after which these outcomes trended down. LOESS models for time to sheath placement, procedure duration, fluoroscopy time, and radiation dose predicted minimum values between procedures 40-50. CONCLUSIONS: Transitioning from pTRA to dTRA for diagnostic cerebral angiography is feasible and safe. The learning curve is overcome between procedures 11 and 33, and further refinement in performance occurs through procedures 40-50.